Working to End Hunger in America

The far-reaching consequences of President Trump’s newly enacted Budget Reconciliation Bill (H.R. 1) —passed by Republicans in Congress and signed by President Trump on July 4, 2025 — will be felt in every corner of the country. Although the fallout will be local, the design is federal. This is not accidental; it is a deliberate strategy to make essential programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) more expensive and politically unsustainable at the state level. By forcing states to shoulder greater expenses and administer these cuts, Republican federal lawmakers deflect responsibility for weakening the nation’s most effective anti-hunger program. Despite strong opposition from Senate and House Democrats — joined by governors, advocates, and constituents — Republicans advanced a bill that prioritizes tax breaks for the wealthy while gutting support for families with low incomes and placing new costs on states.

Despite strong opposition from Senate and House Democrats — joined by governors, advocates, and constituents across the country — Republican-led changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) moved forward. These provisions, embedded in the reconciliation process that approved President Trump’s and congressional Republicans’ broader fiscal agenda in H.R. 1, prioritize tax breaks for the wealthy while shifting greater burdens onto states and working families. 

Currently, the budget process for fiscal year 2026 is in full swing. We have budget proposals from the White House, House, and Senate. As a discretionary program the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is set through this appropriations process each year. Traditionally, WIC has received the funding needed to serve any eligible people who apply, however, not all of the proposed budget includes the needed funding.